How to get big numbers when predicting AI’s effect on growth - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

How to get big numbers when predicting AI’s effect on growth

Consider its scale, scope and speed
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":8.93,"text":"I’ll admit to tuning out much of the debate over whether artificial intelligence is going to destroy us all. "},{"start":14.408999999999999,"text":"If our digital overlords do eventually turn me into a paper clip, then at least I will have enjoyed my final precious moments as a human. "},{"start":21.464,"text":"I’ll have spent them considering a different part of the debate, over how much AI will affect growth. "},{"start":26.357,"text":"The stakes are slightly lower, but there is just as much disagreement. "},{"start":30.087,"text":"Why? "}],[{"start":31.88,"text":"The core discussion concerns AI’s scope, scale and speed. "},{"start":35.922,"text":"Will AI be a force that accelerates automation, or will it also speed up innovation? "},{"start":40.763999999999996,"text":"And will its effects be the avocado slicer of food prep, or the microwave? "},{"start":45.057,"text":"And then there is the risk that while technologists may like to move fast and break things, corporate executives prefer a more sedentary lifestyle. "}],[{"start":52.769999999999996,"text":"There have been several attempts to estimate the effects of generative AI on annual productivity growth, with pretty varied results. "},{"start":59.662,"text":"Last year, Goldman Sachs estimated that in rich countries it could contribute around 1.5 percentage points over a decade. "}],[{"start":67.41,"text":"Soon after that, McKinsey predicted that it could deliver between 0.1 and 0.6 percentage points between 2023 and 2040. "},{"start":75.814,"text":"And most recently Daron Acemoglu of MIT calculated a boost over the next decade of at most 0.2 percentage points. "}],[{"start":83.74,"text":"The gaps between these figures mostly relate to differences over speed and scale. "},{"start":88.294,"text":"Each tries to estimate how much existing work will be affected by generative AI, as well as the potential cost savings. "}],[{"start":95.82,"text":"Acemoglu, for example, suggests that over the next decade around 5 per cent of tasks will be profitably replaced or augmented by AI. "},{"start":103.949,"text":"I’ll argue that my editors should hang on to me otherwise the columns might become too funny.) Even then, the average cost savings across these tasks might only be around 15 per cent — or lower if AI struggles to replace harder ones where decisions require lots of context or lack objective measures of success. "},{"start":119.904,"text":"I hear column writing is very hard. "}],[{"start":123.03999999999999,"text":"McKinsey says it is clear-eyed about the pace of diffusion, drawing on historical evidence that technologies take up to 27 years to reach a plateau in adoption after becoming commercially available. "},{"start":133.41899999999998,"text":"But it seems to be more bullish than Acemoglu about the potential for tasks to be automated. "},{"start":138.099,"text":"In a separate report McKinsey estimates that in the US, generative AI could account for 8 per cent of work hours being automated by 2030. "}],[{"start":146.73999999999998,"text":"The analysts at Goldman Sachs also reckon that quite a large share of work will be affected by AI. "},{"start":152.29399999999998,"text":"But the bigger difference is over timing. "},{"start":154.49899999999997,"text":"They cite the electric motor and personal computing as breakthroughs leading to US labour productivity booms of around 1.5 percentage points per year over a decade. "},{"start":163.29199999999997,"text":"Awkwardly, these took 20 years to start. "},{"start":165.92199999999997,"text":"In other words, the boom they predict is over “a decade”, not the one starting now. "}],[{"start":171.08999999999997,"text":"In a more recent note the Goldman Sachs analysts cite surveys suggesting that fewer than one in 20 companies report the “use of generative AI in regular production”. "},{"start":179.74399999999997,"text":"And they confirm that most of the boost to global GDP will come after 2030. "}],[{"start":184.58999999999997,"text":"Questions over speed and scale are important. "},{"start":187.41899999999998,"text":"But perhaps the bigger question is over AI’s scope. "},{"start":190.42399999999998,"text":"Tyler Cowen of George Mason University recently criticised Acemoglu’s paper for assuming away the possibility that AI would do new tasks or produce new things — just look at the chatbots impersonating Shakespeare or Elon Musk. "},{"start":202.42899999999997,"text":"Acemoglu’s argument is that industry’s focus is elsewhere, for example on digital advertisements. "}],[{"start":208.28999999999996,"text":"There could be bigger benefits in store. "},{"start":210.80699999999996,"text":"Over decades the world has ploughed an increasing share of resources into innovation, with diminishing returns. "},{"start":216.66199999999998,"text":"A study published in 2020 found that research productivity for the US economy had fallen by a factor of 41 since the 1930s. "}],[{"start":225.23999999999995,"text":"Optimists suggest that AI could increase those returns and speed up the rate at which we discover new ideas. "},{"start":231.13199999999995,"text":"Just this week, Google DeepMind unveiled an AI model that could help researchers find new drugs. "},{"start":236.52399999999994,"text":"Ben Jones of Northwestern University suggests that the effects on productivity could be even greater than the most optimistic of those earlier automation-based estimates. "}],[{"start":245.73999999999995,"text":"“Some uncertainty is of course healthy,” says Acemoglu of the change brought on by AI, since “we are at the very very beginning of it”. "},{"start":253.31899999999996,"text":"Which means plenty of other important questions to ponder, including how the spoils of any growth are shared. "},{"start":258.81199999999995,"text":"As well as those, perhaps I’ll allow myself to wonder whether one day there will be an AI so powerful that it can turn paper clips back into humans. "}],[{"start":266.55999999999995,"text":""}]],"url":"https://creatives.ftacademy.cn/album/154099-1715411480.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Lex专栏:AI热潮让1990年代IT品牌“焕发第二春”

尽管戴尔和HPE这样的公司只是更大范围AI相关连环上涨中的一环,但它们的营收增长依然令华尔街感到振奋。

顶级豪华邮轮为何面临“搁浅”风险

奢侈品的核心原则一旦到了公海上,往往就难以奏效。

Wise洗钱调查直指金融科技的根本缺陷

鉴于该公司刚刚跨大西洋上市,此时遭到调查可谓时机极其不利。

顶尖人工智能实验室扩大对机器“意识”的研究

谷歌DeepMind、Anthropic和Meta正在研究:AI是否可能产生意识——如果真的出现,人类将面临什么?

IT咨询公司股价暴跌会结束吗?

埃森哲曾在过去几轮科技革命中赚得盆满钵满,但投资者认为,这一次AI可能会杀死它,而不是让它更强大。

美国“利润机器”的真相

夏尔马:美国企业盈利水平依然令全球侧目,但内部已出现一些断层。只要美国继续大举举债,这些问题大概率仍会被压在水面以下。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×