AI start-up Anthropic settles landmark copyright suit for $1.5bn - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

AI start-up Anthropic settles landmark copyright suit for $1.5bn

Case will compensate authors but could raise costs of training large language models

AI start-up Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5bn to settle a copyright lawsuit over its use of pirated texts, setting a precedent for tech companies facing intellectual property cases from authors and publishers.

The settlement, which must be approved by the San Francisco federal judge overseeing the case, would be “the largest publicly reported copyright recovery in history”, according to a court filing on Friday.

The class action suit was brought by authors who claimed Anthropic had downloaded 465,000 books and other texts from “pirated websites” including Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror, which it then used to train its large language models.

Failure to reach an agreement would have led to a trial, with the prospect of damages of up to $1tn. That would have bankrupted Anthropic, a four-year-old start-up backed by Amazon and Google that was recently valued at $170bn.

The case is among several facing artificial intelligence companies, including OpenAI and Meta, alleging they have improperly used copyrighted works to train their models.

The results will help determine how authors are compensated for the use of their works and could have significant ramifications for how AI companies train their models and the costs of developing them.

Mary Rasenberger, chief executive of the Authors Guild, said Friday’s settlement sent a “strong message to the AI industry that there are serious consequences when they pirate authors’ works to train their AI, robbing those least able to afford it”.

Anthropic and other AI companies have claimed that training models on copyrighted books is fair use, arguing that their models transform the original work into something with a new meaning.

In June, the California district court ruled that Anthropic’s use of some copyrighted works in such a way was fair. But it determined that storing pirated works was “inherently, irredeemably infringing”, teeing up Friday’s settlement.

Friday’s ruling also means Anthropic will have to destroy the datasets it had downloaded from Library Genesis and Pirate Library Mirror.

“In June, the district court issued a landmark ruling on AI development and copyright law, finding that Anthropic’s approach to training AI models constitutes fair use. Today’s settlement, if approved, will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims,” said Anthropic’s deputy general counsel Aparna Sridhar in a statement.

“We remain committed to developing safe AI systems that help people and organisations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery and solve complex problems,” she added.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

投资者押注人工智能将带来混乱?历史并不这么看

以往科技革命的经验表明,精明的现有巨头或可一路摸索、化险为夷,甚至更进一步蓬勃发展。

苹果五十年:科技革命的根源

一门鲜为人知却极具影响力的战后日本管理课程,如何为史蒂夫•乔布斯对品质的执念铺平道路。

忘了特朗普吧,我现在又满仓投资了

为何此刻正是我撤出现金的合适时机。

3月就业强劲增长后,美联储料将继续按兵不动

非农就业增加17.8万,远超预期。

美国经济3月新增17.8万个就业岗位,超出预期

在一连串黯淡数据发布后,该数据表明劳动力市场出现好转迹象。

私募资本有哪些风险?

当投资者寻求撤回资金时,这个22万亿美元的行业否认自己与2008年危机有可比性。监管机构则并不那么确信。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×