Time travellers are using LinkedIn to teach us about artificial intelligence - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Time travellers are using LinkedIn to teach us about artificial intelligence

That’s the headline and we’re sticking to it
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":0.5,"text":"NBER:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":1,"text":"FTAV:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":9.64,"text":"Disappointingly, the recently published NBER paper “Time Travel on Professional Profiles” is not as sci-fi-y as its name might suggest."}],[{"start":18.42,"text":"Authors Nicholas Bloom, Gideon Moore, Lisa K. Simon and Caelan Wilkie-Rogers have not been hunting down self-proclaimed time travellers. Instead, they’ve used cached data to monitor how LinkedIn users “retroactively edit the title or description of a job they have already left”."}],[{"start":34.52,"text":"The thesis of the paper hinges on the idea that while a static assessment of mutable profiles is inherently weak for understanding past trends, one that follows the mutations reveals more."}],[{"start":35.02,"text":"As they write:"}],[{"start":45.24,"text":"These “time-travel” edits are closely tied to labor market transitions: around such edits, workers are much more likely to change employers as compared to later-editing users. This mutability can bias historical measures of skills, but it also reveals workers’ beliefs about which skills are in demand."}],[{"start":45.74,"text":"[…]"}],[{"start":63.08,"text":"Our method requires only that workers believe the skills on their profile influence their hiring probability; we have nothing to say about the efficacy of these revisions in job search."}],[{"start":72.64,"text":"In a sense, this provides a “supply side” counterpart to the “demand side” measurements of changing language in job descriptions. Paper:"}],[{"start":78.92,"text":"Time travel holds the underlying job fixed, making changes in wording likely to reflect changing perceived demand rather than new experiences. The same worker is describing the same job they held previously, where they used the same skills both before and after changing the description. The only thing that can change, then, is the way the worker chooses to describe the job: a reflection of changing demand conditions…"}],[{"start":102.84,"text":"Because time-travel is generally resume polishing, words are almost always net added."}],[{"start":108.18,"text":"To the findings. Readers who’ve witnessed the labour market themes of recent years won’t need much hand-holding on the key changes: robots up, woke down. “Established” LinkedIn users (100+ connections) who made retroactive edits to the description of jobs they’d already left between 2020 and 2026 tended to play up how much they used artificial intelligence tools in previous roles, while de-emphasising DEI:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":108.68,"text":"(Zoomable)"}],[{"start":132.4,"text":"How widespread are such edits, and how far back do they go? The researchers reckon at least one in five LinkedIn users has “time-travelled” in this way and find that most edits are to jobs left years before:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":145.68,"text":"The broad strokes of which types of workers are doing this are unsurprising. The most represented group is AI product managers, the least is dentists."}],[{"start":155.84,"text":"Modelling mentions of AI in LinkedIn users’ old job descriptions “as it was” (green line below) versus “as it is” indicates that users are emphasising usage more now than they did at the time:"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
NB: the green line prior to 2020 shows data from 2020, when the updates file the researchers used begins.
"}],[{"start":167.56,"text":"These transitions, as you might intuitively expect, tend to coincide with users changing companies: after all, if you’re moving jobs within a company they are probably going to care less about how you describe your current job."}],[{"start":180.24,"text":"To an extent, this speaks to LinkedIn’s inherent weirdness: people are encouraged to present themselves like an item in a shop window even if they don’t wish to be bought."}],[{"start":189.76,"text":"Somewhat predictably, the paper also finds a rise in users deploying AI to edit their old job descriptions — with usage rising inversely to education levels. Also somewhat predictable is who is bucking that trend:"}],[{"start":203.28,"text":"Generally, using AI tools to edit your resume declines with education; however, MBAs exhibit significantly higher rates of AI use relative to other master’s degree holders. This association with MBAs is driven largely by relatively low-ranked programs."}],[{"start":224.3,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1786135075_1153.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

AI股票泡沫终于要破裂了吗?

马丁:任何理性的人都能看出AI资产中不可持续的迹象。

埃森哲与“四大”瞄准中型企业市场谋增长

随着AI释放人力、降低服务成本,咨询巨头纷纷将目光投向规模较小的企业,希望以更低价格提供服务。

法拉奇:“我从未支持无休止的战争”

英国改革党领导人在美国共和党中期选举惨败后淡化了自己对伊朗战争的支持。

“蓝色浪潮”对美国经济变革的期待恐将落空

艾肯格林:美国国会的党派构成发生变化,对特朗普剩余任期内的政策制定影响不大。

民主党横扫中期选举,华尔街大金主押注失利

顶级对冲基金经理和私募股权投资公司高管为共和党竞选活动投入逾3亿美元,却几乎未见成效。
11小时前

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×