How to value anything with one simple question - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

How to value anything with one simple question

Find two numbers and ask yourself: ‘Which is probably right and which is probably wrong?’
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.1,"text":"A decade ago — pre-divorce and earning a motza — I used to pay four times what I do now on rent. Our neighbour on one side was the late Paul Allen, co-founder of Microsoft. Across the road were the Beckhams and Qatar’s royal family."}],[{"start":20.7,"text":"Unlike them, our building was subdivided and we lived in the basement. So how did I justify such an exorbitant rent? Chatting over the fence with Lady Glenconner about parties on “her island” of Mustique in the 1960s helped a bit."}],[{"start":34.45,"text":"Mostly, though, I used one of investing’s simplest valuation methodologies. You just ask: “Which number is probably wrong?” In the case of our flat, when I divided the annual rent by the sale price of a similar property on our street, the yield was less than 1 per cent."}],[{"start":51.2,"text":"Given that the risk-free rate of interest at the time was roughly twice that, either house prices in the area were bonkers or the amount our landlord was charging us was much too low. My instinct was the former."}],[{"start":62.400000000000006,"text":"I didn’t think the number that was wrong was our rent. I was paying a fortune, but I didn’t mind because, if you flip the equation on its head, there was no way on earth I could afford to buy the equivalent flat."}],[{"start":73.7,"text":"It turns out I was right, too. If you adjust the Savills prime London index for inflation, luxury house prices have more than halved since the years my ex-wife’s relatives used to chase David and Victoria up the footpath."}],[{"start":87.85000000000001,"text":"Pondering which number is probably wrong is a particularly useful approach for assets that generate an income, such as shares or equity markets. For example, you should rightly ask yourself: is an 8 per cent dividend yield a sensible number (that is, the stock is too cheap) or is the share price correct (and might the dividend soon be cut)?"}],[{"start":108.30000000000001,"text":"Likewise, as I wrote a fortnight ago, my bullishness on equities stems from the fact that I believe their elevated levels are right. In other words, I’m betting that price/earnings ratios are wrong because their denominators will grow faster than expected."}],[{"start":122.75000000000001,"text":"This approach also works nicely when comparing a firm’s equity with its debt. A good example recently is CoreWeave. Its shareholders — until this week, perhaps — see quality and sunlit uplands. Its bonds, on the other hand, trade like junk."}],[{"start":139.45000000000002,"text":"Which is right and which is wrong? You pays your money and takes your choice, as they say, like you can with sovereign bond yields, too. French 10-year bonds currently yield about 40 basis points more over Bunds than Greek bonds."}],[{"start":152.8,"text":"Does that seem right to you? One historic basket case versus another in the making. I haven’t a clue and wouldn’t trust either government with my pension savings, frankly, especially over a decade."}],[{"start":164.4,"text":"Needless to say, this game is easiest played with futures — which basically give you two prices to choose from for the same asset. But the asset class where I’ve made the most money asking the “which is wrong” question is currencies. They work well because each has a value only in relation to another, and that versus yet another — in a never-ending mess of cross-exchange rates."}],[{"start":188.05,"text":"To keep things simple, therefore, I often just ask myself: “Are forex markets right, or can I buy a lot more with a pound in Britain, say, than I can of the same goods and services in Canada with dollars at today’s exchange rate?” If the answer is yes, buy sterling."}],[{"start":205.70000000000002,"text":"Trading currencies based on purchasing power doesn’t always work. No valuation methodology does. But the important thing is to make sure you never compare two numbers that should not be compared, such as the common practice of looking at a stock market’s dividend yield versus bond yields. This is very different from the example above for a single company, where both equity and credit owners rely on the same cash flows being generated."}],[{"start":230.35000000000002,"text":"I’ve written many times that you can’t compare dividend yields, which derive from net profits that move with inflation, to bond coupons, which don’t. Nor is there any long-run relationship between the two whatsoever."}],[{"start":243.35000000000002,"text":"An even worse habit is popular among holders of assets that generate no income whatsoever. Indeed, one of the reasons I tend to spurn the likes of gold and bitcoin is precisely because I cannot apply the which-number-is-right-or-wrong test."}],[{"start":257.90000000000003,"text":"There is nothing inherent to compare prices with, and that is why you often see some ridiculous comparisons with other asset classes: the price of silver measured in average house prices or ether coins denominated in bushels of wheat."}],[{"start":272.20000000000005,"text":"Utter nonsense. When something doesn’t generate an income, the only determinant of its worth is what someone else is willing to pay for it. And good luck trying to model that — especially years into the future."}],[{"start":283.50000000000006,"text":"Happily, no one is bothering to try at the Frieze London art fair this week, where I’m told sales are hot. Indeed, it is impossible to value most so-called alternative assets, from impressionist paintings and Fender guitars to vintage Porsches or Rolex watches."}],[{"start":299.90000000000003,"text":"The irony is that so many of these were among some of the best investments you could have made over the past few decades. Was it luck that there have always been better fools coming along to push prices higher? Or is something else going on?"}],[{"start":312.55,"text":"I’ve had hundreds of requests to write something on alternative assets. Mostly I’ve avoided the topic because I feared my fall from that world might be triggering. I used to look out of my window and see three Rothkos hanging in Valentino’s dining room. But I’m over it now. So next time, I promise."}],[{"start":333,"text":"The author is a former portfolio manager. Email: stuart.kirk@ft.com "}],[{"start":null,"text":"Vanguard FTSE 100 ETF (GBP)"}],[{"start":null,"text":"iShares MSCI EM Asia ETF (USD)"}],[{"start":null,"text":"Vanguard FTSE Japan ETF (USD)"}],[{"start":null,"text":"Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (USD)"}],[{"start":null,"text":"BlackRock Latin American Ords"}],[{"start":null,"text":"4.5% Treasury Gilt 2034"}],[{"start":346.05,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1792196494_8076.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×