EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

随着通胀担忧升温,美联储是否正转向鹰派?

政治动荡和伊朗战争正在对英国经济产生什么影响?德国如何应对这次石油冲击?

中国AI企业在视频生成竞赛中领先美国对手

字节跳动和快手表现优于西方竞争对手,推动广告和娱乐领域的AI视频质量全面提升。

中国数据中心分拆公司计划在新加坡和美国双重上市

DayOne计划按照这座城邦为提振亚洲企业上市而制定的新规,筹集50亿美元。

巴塔哥尼亚从汉坦病毒中汲取的经验

在阿根廷2018年暴发鼠源病毒疫情后,疑有乘客在此遭感染的地区已收紧管控。

永无止境的AI劣质内容正给企业漏洞赏金计划带来压力

“漏洞赏金”计划收到的AI生成的无效报告数量激增。

全球冲突推动地缘政治进入高管课程

中东及其他地区的商学院纷纷回应动荡时期企业对指引日益增长的需求。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×