Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

一周新闻小测:2025年12月13日

您对本周的全球重大新闻了解如何?来做个小测试吧!

AI泡沫是否存在?明年会破裂吗?

专家在年度FT金钱圆桌会议上探讨投资者为2026年需要了解的要点。

美国会在AI竞赛中取胜,却在全面竞争中败给中国吗?

美国在人工智能上已全力投入。但与中国围绕明日关键技术进行末日决战的设想,既是自我迷幻,也是硅谷的游说工具。

现在真的是开始投资的好时机吗?

英国政府启动行动,欲打造“全民投资者”之国,AI泡沫担忧加剧。

“特殊需求”的重新定义如何撼动了教育界

放宽标准让富裕人群受益,却伤害了最困难的人群,并加重了体系负担。

费利西蒂•肯达尔谈爱与失去——以及汤姆•斯托帕德的“温柔天才”

随着复排已故剧作家作品《印度墨》,这位女演员回望她的舞台人生。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×