Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

一周新闻小测:2026年5月2日

您对本周的全球重大新闻了解如何?来做个小测试吧!

你的资金在网络攻击面前有多安全?

Claude的Mythos AI模型在金融软件中发现漏洞,把风险进一步推高。

AI时代的偏执型养育

认为我们能让孩子的教育选择“防机器人”只是幻觉。

若不是扎克伯格,Meta的股价或许显得便宜

这位Facebook老板不仅身兼数职、忙得不可开交,他的世界观也与典型的首席执行官并不相同。

物理世界的反击

伊朗战争提醒我们:塑造我们生活的不是数字技术,而是地理现实。

报告警告:中国绿色科技对欧洲构成国家安全隐患

欧洲各国希望加速向太阳能、风能及其他其供应链的能源转型,而这些都是由中国主导。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×