Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

巴黎圣日耳曼击败阿森纳,成功卫冕欧冠

这家法国俱乐部在点球大战中力克伦敦球队,也象征着海湾主权财富在与美国资本的较量中赢得一场胜利。

中国运动服装热潮令海外品牌步伐轻快

Rapha与露露乐蒙等品牌正搭乘健康养生热潮。

永远只有一位特朗普总统

他刻意缺席儿子的婚礼,似乎就是要让小唐纳德•特朗普明白自己的位置。

逾半“影子船队”油轮存在引发环境灾难的风险

领先的船舶拆解企业表示,已受制裁的老旧船舶应予报废拆解。

山德士警告:廉价中国进口药品威胁欧洲抗生素供应

首席执行官表示:若缺乏更有力的保护措施,欧洲大陆面临失去关键药品生产能力的风险。

中国在摩洛哥打造工业基地令欧盟不安

数十亿美元的投资引发担忧:享受补贴的商品可能会冲击并挤垮欧洲制造商。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×