Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

特朗普为何直击泽连斯基要害?

卢斯:无论美国盟友多么敦促特朗普支持乌克兰,他都无法原谅乌克兰领导人让他在交易能力上显得无能。

巴基斯坦在沙特对也门的战争中面临艰难抉择

防务协定和对沙特的财务依赖,使巴基斯坦几乎没有回旋余地,无法不被卷入与胡塞武装的冲突。

谁在面试你——是HR,还是网安部门?

奥康纳:利用AI进行求职欺诈的行为,迫使原本人情味十足的人力资源领域不得不与疑心重重的网络安全部门合作。

专访扎克伯格:Meta已跻身人工智能技术前沿

在投入巨资挑战AI领域的竞争对手后,这位科技亿万富豪力推Meta新发布的Muse Wonder模型。

沙特机场遭突袭后,王储的经济愿景堪忧

机场遭袭可能对沙特的国家形象以及吸引外国投资者和游客的能力造成更持久损害,而这两者对王储经济计划的成功都至关重要。

美国经济是否像其股市一样“狭窄”?

美国股市屡创新高,但全靠AI交易支撑。那么美国经济呢?也全都依赖AI吗?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×