Being an angel investor is tougher than it looks - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
天使投资

Being an angel investor is tougher than it looks

Former financiers might assume a knack for picking winners, but investing alone requires a different set of capabilities
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":7,"text":"The writer is a former global head of equity capital markets at Bank of America and is now a managing director at Seda Experts"}],[{"start":17.08,"text":"Not long after I left investment banking, I was invited to an angel investing event in central London. Dozens of early-stage companies had set up stalls in a large reception hall to showcase businesses ranging from clean tech to immersive gaming to sports gizmos. Founders weren’t pushing a hard sell; they just offered demos and a chat. The whole affair was impressively run."}],[{"start":43.879999999999995,"text":"As I looked around the room, I recognised several faces. Many were late-career or retired managing directors from banks and funds, now with time on their hands and, presumably, capital to deploy. I wondered: Was this the “smart money” I should invest alongside? How many of us truly knew what we were doing?"}],[{"start":66.97,"text":"Angel investing often appeals to former financiers as a natural next step. It enables them to stay engaged, apply experience, and maybe earn a big return. There’s the draw of meeting visionary founders and the hope of backing the next breakout success. Once you leave investment banking, the funding pitches start pouring in. I’ve lost count of how many have landed in my inbox."}],[{"start":93.72,"text":"It’s all quite beguiling. After years of analysing balance sheets, modelling cash flows and structuring deals, it’s tempting for former bankers to think they can identify start-up winners. But venture runs on a different rhythm. It’s longer and less structured than any investment banking project. "}],[{"start":113.42,"text":"The contrast couldn’t be sharper. In banking, you operate within an institutional machine, supported by an army of analysts, sector specialists and lawyers. Angel investing strips away that infrastructure; it’s just you, a pitch deck, and a half-hour video call. Rigorous financial forecasting and due diligence give way to guesswork around total addressable market and a seat-of-the-pants judgment of management’s capabilities."}],[{"start":140.06,"text":"The time horizon also poses a challenge. Most early-stage investments remain illiquid for five to 10 years, or longer. You write a cheque and then wait. And wait. Maybe you get asked to put in more money. And then you wait some more. One angel quipped that the real challenge wasn’t the capital locked up, but the boredom. Staying engaged for the long haul, often without visibility or control, takes patience and discipline."}],[{"start":169.94,"text":"Even when things go well, jackpot returns can prove elusive. Structured notes, dilution and liquidation waterfalls can erode upside. BrewDog offers a stark reminder: as FT Alphaville reported, the company placed preference shares with a private equity firm in 2017, enabling the founders to take out a big chunk of money. But the high cost of servicing the 18 per cent compounding coupon has left ordinary shareholders with scraps. In another case, a former colleague backed a wildly successful fintech unicorn early on, only to see her stake heavily diluted in later rounds. She’s sitting on a respectable paper gain, but it’s no windfall — and she’s still waiting for her chance to cash out."}],[{"start":222.51999999999998,"text":"Still, ex-bankers can succeed, especially those who approach angel investing with seriousness and stamina. A few I know have built impressive portfolios. One took a board seat early, helped shape strategy, and now chairs a profitable company. Others have clubbed together into syndicates, pooling funds to diversify, negotiate better terms and conduct better due diligence. These aren’t casual successes; they reflect strategic, committed effort over several years."}],[{"start":258.36,"text":"Former financiers add tangible value. Founders often have deep but narrow knowledge; bankers can provide macro context, sector insight and financial acumen. They can also bring their personal networks, including potential investors, advisers and business partners."}],[{"start":278.94,"text":"But nothing guarantees success. Top angels assume most investments won’t pan out, relying on a few home runs to make up for a long tail of strikeouts. While tax incentives like the UK’s Enterprise Investment Scheme may boost returns and cushion losses with generous reliefs and offsets, they don’t change the underlying odds of failure."}],[{"start":303.68,"text":"The maths remains brutal. One ex-colleague, now a seasoned angel, shared his portfolio: 45 investments, with 10 complete losses and two positioned to return capital at a gain. The remaining 33, he says, have “option value”. While the strategy might eventually work, it demands deep pockets and deeper reservoirs of patience. Despite good paydays as an investment banker, he lacks cash flow because so much capital is tied up in these ventures. This explains why he moved recently to a low-tax jurisdiction to work as CFO for a private firm. "}],[{"start":344.07,"text":"Angel investing can be stimulating and, occasionally, lucrative. Bankers have the background and skillset to succeed. But those expecting a road to quick riches will be disappointed. This is no retirement hobby."}],[{"start":359.06,"text":"Letter in response to this article:"}],[{"start":361.41,"text":"Angel investors’ motives include virtuous reasons / From Colin Mason, Emeritus Professor of Entrepreneurship, Honorary Senior Research Fellow, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK"}],[{"start":384.43,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1758173494_7948.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

黄仁勋走下神坛,科技巨头“创始人模式”遭拷问

如今已显而易见:当AI关乎经济、国家安全以及几乎所有其他领域时,放任领导人不受约束会带来风险。

英伟达敲响的警钟:该如何为首席执行官估值?

更清楚地阐明创始人为何重要、重要到何种程度,应该会让所有人受益。

黄仁勋之后,谁来执掌英伟达?

黄仁勋采用一种不同寻常的扁平化管理架构,如果他被罢免,没有哪位高管能够独自接替他,这一架构将分崩离析。

蓝色浪潮应拿繁文缛节开刀

阿姆斯特朗:民主党可以通过削减监管带来的时间和金钱成本,让美国人的生活更省钱、更轻松。

民主党或阻挠数据中心扩建,引发AI市场恐慌

中期选举后民主党掀起蓝色浪潮,数据中心建设热潮或将戛然而止。

成长投资还是赌博?

伯恩斯坦:当前股市中的极端冒险行为或许正孕育着个人职业生涯中难得一遇的投资良机。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×