Tech trumps tariffs: why US exceptionalism will last - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
美国经济

Tech trumps tariffs: why US exceptionalism will last

The view that the stock market is in a massive bubble and bound to crash is incorrect over the medium term
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":7.6,"text":"The writer is Professor Emeritus at the Stern School of Business and senior economic strategist at Hudson Bay Capital"}],[{"start":16.38,"text":"After the so-called “liberation day” tariffs announcement, the conventional wisdom about the US economy became very pessimistic. A new consensus was built on worries over tariffs, policies such as restrictions to migration, unfunded large fiscal deficits, threats to the independence of the Federal Reserve and the erosion of rule of law."}],[{"start":40.36,"text":"The argument was that American exceptionalism was over — the US economy was facing stagflation, the stock market was set for a slump or worse and the exorbitant privilege of the dollar as the major global reserve would erode. As the US weaponised its currency, the value of the dollar would start to fall rapidly over time."}],[{"start":64.16,"text":"In a recent paper of mine and a companion one by my Hudson Bay colleague Jason Cuttler, we reject such pessimism and have a much more positive outlook for the US economy and markets over time."}],[{"start":78,"text":"First, market discipline, reasonable advisers and Fed independence provided guardrails on the worst policies after “liberation day”. As markets corrected sharply soon afterwards, Trump was forced to blink and negotiate more reasonable trade deals."}],[{"start":96.94,"text":"Thus, the US is experiencing a few quarters of a growth recession (GDP expansion below potential) and a modest rise in inflation rather than a serious stagflationary recession. By next year growth will recover as monetary easing and fiscal stimulus are still under way while financial conditions have eased and the tailwinds from AI-related capital expenditure will continue."}],[{"start":125.94,"text":"Second, American exceptionalism will continue as the US (along with China) is ahead in the most important industries of the future including AI and machine learning, robotics, quantum computing, space commercialisation and defence technology."}],[{"start":144.43,"text":"I estimate that annual US potential growth could rise from 2 to 4 per cent by the end of this decade while stagflationary policies could reduce it by 0.5 percentage points. Thus, tech trumps tariffs. If American exceptionalism was ruling when potential growth was 2 per cent, it will strengthen as growth rises towards 4 per cent."}],[{"start":168.07,"text":"Ditto for stock returns: when annual growth was 2 per cent for the last two decades, US equity returns were around double digits, well above those of other advanced economies and emerging markets. If growth will be much higher this decade and in subsequent ones, such equity returns will be even higher. Price-earnings valuation ratios can remain elevated if faster earnings growth is driven by increased economic growth. Of course, temporary market corrections will occur and tech disruptions will lead to winners and losers. However, the now common view that the US stock market is in a massive bubble and bound to crash is incorrect over the medium term.  "}],[{"start":217.64999999999998,"text":"As far as debt sustainability is concerned, the public debt to GDP is estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to rise sharply under the assumption that real economic growth will average 1.6 per cent per year from 2025 to 2055. If potential growth is slightly higher at 2.3 per cent, the ratio is stabilised over time. With growth at 3 per cent or above, the ratio drops over time and is sustainable, assuming that the growth dividend is not wasted with even more spending. Increased GDP growth might lead to higher real bond yields but a large tech-driven positive aggregate supply shock could reduce inflation to near zero over time as costs of production of goods and services sharply fall while productivity growth rises. So the net impact on nominal bond yields could be a wash over time."}],[{"start":278.83,"text":"Even the external liabilities of the US are sustainable as larger current account deficits — driven by the surge in tech-driven capex — will be financed by equity inflows of capital into dollar assets. The US will look like an emerging-market economy where a natural resource or productivity boom leads to an investment boom."}],[{"start":302.15999999999997,"text":"While the dollar has weakened this year for a variety of factors such as the noise on tariffs, Fed easing and talk of policy deals to weaken the dollar, over time equilibrium real exchange rates depend on growth differentials. If the US growth accelerates while the Eurozone stagnates over the medium term, the dollar will appreciate relative to the euro."}],[{"start":328.2,"text":"Of course, a variety of downside risks remain including geopolitical strains and the disruptions caused by unprecedented tech innovations. But over the medium term, the US economy and markets are best positioned among advanced economies. They will continue to benefit from the US being the most innovative advanced country."}],[{"start":359.62,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1764061871_7293.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

科技巨头的债券是否对美国国债产生了挤出效应?

美国国债收益率上升,超大规模云服务商大量发行债券被认为是主要原因之一,真的是这样吗?

巴基斯坦军方为何无法解决伊姆兰•汗问题

即使身陷囹圄,这名前总理的受欢迎程度之高仍是该国实际统治者穆尼尔元帅面临的最大威胁。

特朗普的关税战如何重创美国小企业主

贝蒂:取消“小额豁免”政策原本旨在打击直接向美国个人消费者销售商品的中国电商,但对美国小众企业造成了连带损害。

哈桑•派克:共和党的眼中钉

这位近日遭英国禁止入境的左翼主播告诉FT,为何自己成了美国保守派备战中期选举时的头号“眼中钉”。

宾利首款纯电动车售价不到法拉利Luce一半

这家豪华汽车制造商推出托卡尔SUV,瞄准更年轻及首次购买宾利的客户。

Lex专栏:特朗普的柴油出口禁令将适得其反

暂停这种关键燃料的对外销售或许短期内看起来有好处,但美国很快就会深受其害。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×