How the internet can rebuild trust - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
人工智能

How the internet can rebuild trust

Algorithms and generative AI models that decide what billions of users see should be transparent
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

As AI companies fight for dominance, the temptation to embed bias — commercial, political or cultural — into training data will be immense
"}],[{"start":5.8,"text":"The writer is co-founder of Wikipedia and author of ‘The Seven Rules of Trust’"}],[{"start":11.29,"text":"When I founded Wikipedia in 2001, pioneers of the internet were excited by its promise to give the world access to truth and connection."}],[{"start":22.18,"text":"Two decades later, that optimism has curdled into cynicism. We scroll through feeds serving up news we no longer believe, interact with bots we cannot identify and brace for the next synthetic scandal created by fake images from artificial intelligence."}],[{"start":42.06,"text":"Before the web can move forward, it must remember how it earned trust in the first place."}],[{"start":48.49,"text":"The defining difference between web 1.0 and the platforms that dominate today is not technological sophistication but moral architecture. Early online communities were transparent about process and purpose. They exposed how information was created, corrected and shared. That visibility generated accountability. People could see how the system worked and participate in fixing its mistakes. Trust emerged not from perfection (there was still plenty of online trolling, flame wars and toxicity), but from openness."}],[{"start":84.49000000000001,"text":"Today’s digital landscape reverses that logic. Recommendation algorithms and generative AI models decide what billions of users see, yet their workings remain opaque. When platforms insist their systems are too complex to explain, users are asked to substitute faith for understanding."}],[{"start":105.78,"text":"AI intensifies the problem. Large language models can produce fluent paragraphs and convincing deepfakes. The tools that promised to democratise knowledge now threaten to make knowledge unrecognisable. If everything can be fabricated, the distinction between truth and illusion becomes a matter of persuasion."}],[{"start":127.36,"text":"Re-establishing trust in this environment requires more than fact-checking or content moderation. It requires structural transparency. Every platform that mediates information should make provenance visible: where data originated, how it was processed, and what uncertainty surrounds it. Think of it as nutritional labelling for information. Without it, citizens cannot make informed judgments and democracies cannot function."}],[{"start":156.64,"text":"Equally important is independence. As AI companies fight for dominance, the temptation to embed bias — commercial, political or cultural — into training data will be immense. Guardrails must ensure the entities curating public knowledge are accountable to the public, not just investors."}],[{"start":177.42999999999998,"text":"And we must revive civility too. Some of the best early online spaces relied on norms that valued reasoned argument over insult. They were imperfect but self-correcting because participants felt a duty to the collective project. Today’s social platforms monetise outrage. Restoring trust means designing systems that reward good-faith discourse — through visibility algorithms, community-based moderation, or friction that forces reflection before reposting."}],[{"start":212.55999999999997,"text":"Governments have a role to play but regulation alone cannot rebuild trust. It has to be observed in practice. Platforms should disclose not only how their algorithms work but also when they fail. AI developers should publish dataset sources and error rates."}],[{"start":232.7,"text":"The challenge of our time is not that information is scarce but that authenticity is. Important aspects of the early internet succeeded because people could trace what they read to another human being, even if the other human being was operating behind a pseudonym. The new internet must restore that chain of custody."}],[{"start":255.83999999999997,"text":"We are entering an era when machines can mimic any voice and invent any image. If we want truth to survive that onslaught, we must embed transparency, independence and empathy into the digital architecture itself. The early days of the web showed it could be done. The question is whether we still have the will to do it again."}],[{"start":284.46999999999997,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1764835851_6780.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

科技巨头的债券是否对美国国债产生了挤出效应?

美国国债收益率上升,超大规模云服务商大量发行债券被认为是主要原因之一,真的是这样吗?

巴基斯坦军方为何无法解决伊姆兰•汗问题

即使身陷囹圄,这名前总理的受欢迎程度之高仍是该国实际统治者穆尼尔元帅面临的最大威胁。

特朗普的关税战如何重创美国小企业主

贝蒂:取消“小额豁免”政策原本旨在打击直接向美国个人消费者销售商品的中国电商,但对美国小众企业造成了连带损害。

哈桑•派克:共和党的眼中钉

这位近日遭英国禁止入境的左翼主播告诉FT,为何自己成了美国保守派备战中期选举时的头号“眼中钉”。

宾利首款纯电动车售价不到法拉利Luce一半

这家豪华汽车制造商推出托卡尔SUV,瞄准更年轻及首次购买宾利的客户。

Lex专栏:特朗普的柴油出口禁令将适得其反

暂停这种关键燃料的对外销售或许短期内看起来有好处,但美国很快就会深受其害。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×