Europe doesn’t need driverless cars - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
谷歌

Europe doesn’t need driverless cars

The roadways are already safe and robotaxis risk increasing traffic
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.85,"text":"The writer is a senior fellow at the MIT Mobility Initiative"}],[{"start":10.5,"text":"Get ready, Europe. The robotaxis are coming. This year, Londoners could see driverless cars from China’s Baidu and Waymo, the self-driving subsidiary of Google’s Alphabet. Tensor Auto and GreenMobility are planning to launch autonomous cars in Copenhagen while Stellantis and Pony.ai want to do the same in Luxembourg. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has voiced her support: “Self-driving cars are already a reality in the United States and China. The same should be true here in Europe.”"}],[{"start":45.03,"text":"She is right about the first part. Autonomous rides are available in Chinese cities like Beijing and Wuhan and in the US, where I live, driverless cars from Waymo, Zoox and Tesla navigate the streets of cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Austin. Waymo is reported to provide 450,000 paid trips per week."}],[{"start":69.11,"text":"Driverless journeys can be pleasantly private, albeit too expensive for most people to take them regularly (Waymo rides often cost around a third more than Uber taxis). But to win over regulators and the general public, American robotaxi companies have also presented themselves as an urgently needed solution to the country’s abysmal record of crash deaths. "}],[{"start":95,"text":"Such messaging is of dubious relevance to Europe, however, where roadways are already much safer than those in the US. Furthermore, Europeans are more likely to bike and ride public transportation — travel modes that are vulnerable to a deluge of self-driving cars."}],[{"start":112.53,"text":"So why, exactly, does Europe want robotaxis?"}],[{"start":117.02,"text":"Driverless cars are often perceived as an embodiment of innovation and their developers have long claimed that computers can operate vehicles more safely than humans. They will not drive inebriated, exhausted or distracted."}],[{"start":132.01,"text":"Unaffiliated experts, such as Phil Koopman at Carnegie Mellon, say it is still too soon to know whether robot drivers are really safer. But a technological fix for crashes would be a godsend in the US, where the death count rose by over 25 per cent between 2010 and 2023. An American is more than twice as likely to die in a crash as a Canadian or Korean and more than three times as likely as an Israeli or Spaniard."}],[{"start":164.64,"text":"Europe is in a different situation. Smaller cars, higher transit use and more pedestrianised areas make roads safer. In 2023, the European Union averaged roughly 4.5 crash deaths per 100,000 residents, less than half the American equivalent. Roads in non-EU member states like Britain and Norway were even safer. A handful of Nordic cities like Helsinki have almost eliminated fatal crashes by slowing cars down."}],[{"start":196.48,"text":"This means the upside of robotaxis in Europe is lower. And there are considerable downsides to introducing autonomous cars into transportation networks that do not revolve around motor vehicles. Robotaxis have caused relatively few problems in car-centric American cities like Phoenix. But in San Francisco they have blocked bike lanes and obstructed transit vehicles. Such mishaps should be a warning for European leaders not to let their cities become beholden to the automobile."}],[{"start":232.70999999999998,"text":"Technological marvels they may be, but robotaxis are still cars and cars are a uniquely inefficient means of moving large numbers of people when space is at a premium. By inviting robotaxis into their narrow, busy streets, European cities risk worsening congestion. In California, data shows that Waymos spend almost half their time “deadheading” — driving around empty — which increases traffic. Gridlocked cities would undermine the quality of life and economic productivity that European leaders like von der Leyen want."}],[{"start":268.89,"text":"Robotaxi deployment has been compared to a race — one European carmakers have yet to start. If so, this is a race Europeans should skip altogether."}],[{"start":286.71,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1767752228_7327.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美防务争端后,英国拉拢Anthropic扩大伦敦业务

基尔•斯塔默政府加紧推动一家美国人工智能初创公司在英国扩大业务布局。

AI是新的水力压裂吗?

针对数据中心的反弹,与之前能源领域的“邻避主义”如出一辙。

特朗普誓言:若伊朗不重新开放霍尔木兹海峡,将摧毁其发电厂和桥梁

战争进入第六周之际,布伦特原油在早盘小幅上涨至每桶略高于111美元。

伊朗允许伊拉克船只通过霍尔木兹海峡

德黑兰的决定可能使每日300万桶石油释放至国际市场。

特朗普如何成了科技界的“首席监管者”

他在该领域的干预力度已超出欧盟所做的一切。

战争会对美国通胀产生多大影响?

伊朗战争会推高中国的通胀吗?欧元区零售销售会否进一步加剧欧元的压力?
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×