Supreme Court reminds America (and Trump) what citizenship is - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 美国

Supreme Court reminds America (and Trump) what citizenship is

The United States has always been based on the notion of welcoming newcomers from every country
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.75,"text":"Good news for American soccer fans. Folarin Balogun, one of the breakout stars of this year’s World Cup team, is still a US citizen courtesy of a landmark Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday that swatted down President Donald Trump’s attack on birthright citizenship."}],[{"start":22,"text":"Balogun, who was born in Brooklyn to Nigerian parents who were temporarily visiting from London, is as much a citizen as the direct descendants of the country’s founding fathers, the court held."}],[{"start":32.85,"text":"Chief Justice John Roberts’ closely watched opinion is a welcome — and overdue — defence of an inclusive definition of what it means to be an American, even as the country gears up to celebrate its 250th birthday. "}],[{"start":45.85,"text":"The court ruled 6-3 that Trump’s executive order denying citizenship to the US-born children of undocumented migrants was illegal. A smaller 5-4 majority held that the principle that children born on American soil are citizens was enshrined in the country’s constitution in the 1860s."}],[{"start":65.45,"text":"“Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights — to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the 14th Amendment extended that promise to ‘every freeborn person in this land’. We keep that promise today,” Roberts wrote."}],[{"start":80.75,"text":"Founded by religious pilgrims, adventurers and debtors all seeking a fresh start, the United States has always been based on the notion of welcoming newcomers from every country. The country’s decennial census did not even start asking where people had been born until 1850."}],[{"start":98.25,"text":"As Roberts writes in his opinion, Americans initially assumed that citizenship depended on where you were born unless you took steps to alter it. That changed in 1857 when the Supreme Court issued what is widely considered the worst decision in its history, Dred Scott, and helped provoke the Civil War. "}],[{"start":117.9,"text":"After anti-slavery forces in the North won, the 14th Amendment reinstated the principle that soil, rather than blood, determined citizenship. But as immigration shot up at the end of the 19th century, so too did efforts to question the Americanness of the children born to unfamiliar arrivals. In 1898 a wise Supreme Court reinforced the promise of the American welcome by ruling that birthright citizenship also applied to a child of Chinese immigrants."}],[{"start":147.1,"text":"There matters stood for more than a century, as generations of immigrants, including two sets of my great-grandparents, set sail for America hoping for a better life. They never questioned whether their offspring would truly belong, even after Congress clamped down hard on immigration from Asia and southern and eastern Europe in the 1920s. "}],[{"start":166.6,"text":"The current attacks on birthright citizenship coincide with the return of mass immigration. Nearly 15 per cent of US residents are foreign-born, the highest share since 1890, and more than one in four US children has at least one immigrant parent."}],[{"start":183.54999999999998,"text":"Today the Supreme Court has rightly held the line, but the five-justice constitutional bulwark against xenophobia is a very thin one. "}],[{"start":192.29999999999998,"text":"At a time when many Americans are pessimistic about their own future and that of their country, it is easy to fear newcomers. What the US needs are regular reminders that immigration makes the country stronger rather than sapping its prosperity."}],[{"start":206.35,"text":"So here’s to the US men’s World Cup squad — more than half its members are dual citizens and six were born outside the country. Long may its run continue."}],[{"start":224.35,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1782880985_3690.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

AI股票泡沫终于要破裂了吗?

马丁:任何理性的人都能看出AI资产中不可持续的迹象。

埃森哲与“四大”瞄准中型企业市场谋增长

随着AI释放人力、降低服务成本,咨询巨头纷纷将目光投向规模较小的企业,希望以更低价格提供服务。

法拉奇:“我从未支持无休止的战争”

英国改革党领导人在美国共和党中期选举惨败后淡化了自己对伊朗战争的支持。

“蓝色浪潮”对美国经济变革的期待恐将落空

艾肯格林:美国国会的党派构成发生变化,对特朗普剩余任期内的政策制定影响不大。

民主党横扫中期选举,华尔街大金主押注失利

顶级对冲基金经理和私募股权投资公司高管为共和党竞选活动投入逾3亿美元,却几乎未见成效。
19小时前

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×