The high price of insider information | 内幕信息的高昂代价 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

The high price of insider information
内幕信息的高昂代价

Without tough enforcement, prediction platforms provide fertile ground for manipulation
若缺乏强有力的执法,预测平台将为操纵行为提供滋生土壤。

Back in the 2000s, one of the most notorious insider trading scandals centred on a pharmaceutical chief executive who dumped his company’s shares after learning that the US Food and Drug Administration had rejected its main cancer drug. People around ImClone’s Sam Waksal, including his daughter and father (who were not charged with any criminal offence), also sold stock. Lifestyle guru Martha Stewart was drawn in after their shared broker tipped her off to the trading.

When the failed application became public, ImClone’s shares plummeted, Waksal went to prison, and Stewart did too after lying to a government probe.

That history makes me worry about Kalshi’s announcement last week that it plans to accept bets on FDA approvals and clinical trial results. The prediction market says would-be participants will have to disclose their employers and that people who work at drugmakers or have access to unblinded data will be barred from participating. It also will not start the betting until after trial enrolment has already closed.

Kalshi contends that such “events contracts” will keep competitors and the public better informed about a vital industry and be of interest to traders who want to bet on specific drug milestones, rather than take a view on an entire drugmaker’s share price. It also argues its surveillance systems are sophisticated enough to prevent insiders from abusing their access.

“Even though the surface area is broader, events contracts are distilled into a single question and what is material is pretty narrow, so that allows us to zero in on, OK who would know this? It’s a small group of individuals,” says the company’s enforcement director Robert DeNault.

That theory extends well beyond pharma. DeNault revealed last week that Kalshi had frozen the account of Donald Trump’s longtime teleprompter operator for allegedly using insider knowledge of the president’s speeches to bet on their contents.

Kalshi’s policing efforts stand in sharp contrast to the general vibe in Washington. Some members of Congress regularly trade stocks affected by their actions, and a trio of anonymous accounts at Kalshi’s offshore rival Polymarket not only placed timely wagers on the first Iran attack but also made $600,000 on the April ceasefire.

Last week, the Trumps, who have raked in $2.2bn since returning to the White House, unveiled another moneymaking venture that surprised even hardened Wall Street financiers.

Trump Media & Technology Group, the family-controlled social media group, has discussed charging traders $100,000 a month for faster access to the president’s posts on Truth Social. While this may sound a lot like the high-speed feeds that the hedge fund traders paid for in Michael Lewis’s Flash Boys, Trump’s involvement takes the privileged access up a notch — or three.

Not only is TMTG attempting to profit from a government official’s news-making pronouncements, but it is doing so with a pitch sheet that touts previous Trump posts that moved stock and oil markets and inherently promises that he will continue to do so.

Even companies that doubt the trading value of the feed may feel pressure to sign up lest they lose a leg up on their competitors in a White House that prizes fealty.

At the same time, this Trump administration has done relatively little to crack down on market misbehaviour. Enforcement at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, where Kalshi refers its cases of suspicious trading, fell off a cliff last year from 58 cases in the last full fiscal year of the Biden administration to 13 in FY 2025.

Meanwhile, the Securities and Exchange Commission saw insider trading and market manipulation cases drop from 54 to 48 as total enforcement actions fell 22 per cent to 456.

The men atop the two watchdogs insist they will continue to provide “vigorous oversight” and “meaningful investor protection”. But the only two people who have been prosecuted for prediction markets abuses so far are a low-ranking soldier who allegedly misused classified information about the January military operation in Venezuela and a Google engineer who allegedly bet on search engine trends. Both men are fighting the charges. Trump’s teleprompter operator has not been charged with wrongdoing.

Market providers can only do so much with advanced detection techniques and bettor screening. Without the threat of government prosecution, unscrupulous people will keep trying to profit from inside knowledge. The ever-increasing reach of prediction markets all but ensures that more and more of them will find ways to do so.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×