Britain, Brexit and the cat-flap option - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 英国退欧

Britain, Brexit and the cat-flap option

The political, strategic and economic momentum for a reversal of Brexit is growing
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.68,"text":"“Come all the way back.” That was Roland Lescure, France’s finance minister, responding to Andy Burnham’s suggestion that Britain needs to rethink its relations with the EU."}],[{"start":16,"text":"Lescure was not a lone voice. His boss, President Emmanuel Macron, says the reversal of Brexit is an “excellent” idea. Pedro Sánchez, Spain’s prime minister, suggested that Britain would be welcomed back with “open arms”."}],[{"start":30.44,"text":"So could we be looking at a cat-flap Brexit? Our feline friends have a habit of screaming to get out of the house — before demanding, with equal fervour, to come back in again. Will Britain one day stroll back through the EU cat flap?"}],[{"start":44.28,"text":"Clearly, the door to the EU is rather better fortified than the average cat flap. There would be formidable obstacles to overcome before Britain could rejoin. But the political, economic and strategic case for reversing Brexit is gathering strength and momentum."}],[{"start":60.8,"text":"Start with the politics. Behind his folksy exterior, Burnham is a shrewd and ruthless political operator. He knows that opinion polls now suggest that 59 per cent of British people want to rejoin the EU, with just 32 per cent opposed. And yet no major political party is currently advocating rejoining. That looks like the political equivalent of an open goal. The commentator Sam Freedman points out that polls suggest that “a strong manifesto commitment on the EU could add four to seven points to Labour’s vote percentage.”"}],[{"start":93.88,"text":"Key advisers to the prime minister concluded long ago that Brexit has acted as a drag on the British economy — and that rejoining the customs union or the EU’s internal market would not be enough to repair the damage. Every big goal that Burnham has — from fixing social care to spending more on defence — is hamstrung by a lack of money. If rejoining the EU could raise the growth rate then a lot of other issues would become easier to solve."}],[{"start":119.4,"text":"Finally, there is the strategic case. Donald Trump’s diesel deal with Russia has underlined his profound differences with Britain over Ukraine. The US president has also steadily undermined faith in the future of the Nato alliance. The British know that their future security is likely to depend on working more closely with European allies. That would be significantly easier if Britain were inside the EU — and had automatic access to common European defence spending."}],[{"start":145.04,"text":"But actually rejoining the EU could be a daunting process. The old deal that Britain had before — in particular the budget rebate — would not be on offer. Opt-outs from the Schengen border-free zone and from the single European currency could no longer be assumed. Both currency and borders remain very sensitive issues in the British debate."}],[{"start":164.6,"text":"Burnham would have reason to fear that a soft majority in favour of rejoining the EU would fall away, as the reality of what that entails became apparent. Despite the encouraging words from Macron, some of Burnham’s key advisers are particularly wary of France — which they regard as easily the most hardline of the EU nations in its attitude to Britain. Some even fear a replay of the 1960s, when Charles de Gaulle blocked Britain’s first application to join the EU."}],[{"start":190.06,"text":"The France that would sit in judgment on a British application to rejoin the EU would also no longer be the country of Macron and Lescure. A victory for Marine Le Pen in next year’s presidential election might change the debate about British re-entry in unpredictable ways."}],[{"start":204.56,"text":"If Le Pen plunged the EU into chaos — or dragged France to the far right — then rejoining might seem like a less attractive option for the UK. The threat of a debt crisis in France or elsewhere in the Eurozone might also make the EU seem less attractive. On the other hand, outside the Eurozone, Britain itself might be even more exposed to the bond markets than France. And some of Le Pen’s demands for a rollback of some EU powers are reminiscent of the traditional British position. A looser EU that was no longer driving towards “ever closer union” might even be easier for Britain to rejoin."}],[{"start":237.32,"text":"The bigger question that the EU and its constituent governments have to answer is — do they really want Britain back? And even if the answer to that is ‘Yes’ — are they prepared to invest the time and energy required to make it happen?"}],[{"start":248.44,"text":"The scars left by Brexit have only just begun to heal. The Europeans will also want evidence of a settled consensus in Britain. Negotiating a re-entry treaty — only to have Nigel Farage come to power and rip it up — would be a nightmare for all concerned."}],[{"start":266.8,"text":"On the other hand, the attractions for the EU of Britain rejoining are also considerable. At a time when Brussels is scorned in Washington and Moscow, a British vote to rejoin the club would be a powerful vote of confidence in the future of the European project."}],[{"start":283.4,"text":"The world is also a much more threatening place for Europeans than it was in 2016, when Britain voted to leave. Renewed UK membership would add some economic and military weight that the EU could certainly do with. Unlike many other potential member states, the British would also be substantial contributors to the EU budget."}],[{"start":303.84,"text":"Beyond the difficult technical negotiations involved in reversing Brexit, it is the bigger strategic question that really matters. Do both sides see a common interest in Britain rejoining the EU? If the answer to that is a clear yes — then it can and should happen."}],[{"start":321,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1791856289_2879.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×