Can consultants reinvent themselves once again? - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Can consultants reinvent themselves once again?

As AI becomes more capable, human advisers must find new ways to prove their worth
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.4,"text":"Generative AI platforms share a few traits with consultants. Both are now ubiquitous, both seek to embed themselves in business operations and both ingest valuable information from elsewhere and sell it back to users as tailored solutions to specific questions."}],[{"start":23.15,"text":"It remains a stretch to imagine AI replacing consultants completely, as some doomsters predict and plenty of consulting’s critics hope. But it is also clear that wider access to plausible, well-informed, deftly presented advice, supplied by a machine rather than an expensive PowerPoint-toting human being, is posing new challenges to the business model."}],[{"start":46.15,"text":"At Accenture’s investor day this week, chief executive Julie Sweet mounted the case for the defence. It is based on her conviction that big IT-centric consultancies like hers have “the breadth and the talent to be able to help [clients] achieve their [AI] ambitions”. Meanwhile, strategy consultants such as McKinsey, Boston Consulting Group, Bain and countless smaller boutiques stand ready to offer the road maps that companies need. "}],[{"start":73.65,"text":"The big firms were the superintelligence once, or claimed they were. But AI could undermine their old power “to persuade people that [the] ability to solve problems was just as inspired as the solutions themselves”, to quote Duff McDonald’s 2013 history of McKinsey, The Firm. "}],[{"start":92.55000000000001,"text":"Clients are increasingly looking to machines to do the problem solving, particularly at the less complex end of the market. Where companies require help with the most difficult AI problems and adoption, they may be more likely to turn to consultancies that can attract the most skilled deployment engineers. Indeed, AI labs and talent magnets such as Anthropic and OpenAI are themselves now chasing high-end AI consulting business. "}],[{"start":119.00000000000001,"text":"The economics of the established consultants are creaking as a result. Simple mandates used to be overpriced and farmed out to junior staff, subsidising the trickier work. Companies are now taking the basic jobs in-house and handing them to AI to complete. Consultants’ inability to bill the hours spent prepping a slide deck that an AI agent can churn out easily should eventually focus clients and their advisers more sharply on payment for results. That would be positive. But the transition could be painful."}],[{"start":149.35000000000002,"text":"Still, consultancies have not survived as long as they have by missing disruptive business trends. They spotted early that AI would be the next technology both to discombobulate and excite the boardroom — and leaned into it. Many firms have already hedged their bets by establishing cheaper automated offerings that clients can purchase off the shelf. They have emphasised the juicy efficiencies AI offers and embraced the technology quickly in their own work, demonstrating its value (and sometimes inadvertently highlighting its pitfalls by, for instance, publishing reports polluted by AI hallucinations). "}],[{"start":185.50000000000003,"text":"Change is usually good news for change experts. From the arrival of the internet, via digitisation, Big Data and the cloud, consultancies have found ways to convince clients to pay for advice, reassurance and technical input. Sometimes they win mandates because boards lack the guts to push through destabilising changes on their own and prefer to pay “a few hooded executioners”, to quote Alexander Starritt’s description of a fictionalised McKinsey restructuring team in his state-of-capitalism novel Drayton and Mackenzie. Sometimes executives need someone to blame if their strategy stumbles. "}],[{"start":220.95000000000005,"text":"More positively, directors and executives will often reach for a firm hand to hold when their world is shaken by uncertainty. As AI becomes ever more present and capable, the question is not whether businesses will still need that reassurance, but how much of it they will want delivered by flesh-and-blood rather than silicon. Consultants will have to polish their pitch once more."}],[{"start":248.45000000000005,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1792291223_7078.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×