Ukraine’s freedom must be defended - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 战争

Ukraine’s freedom must be defended

Elections show the importance of victory in the conflict between despotism and democracy
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.52,"text":"Democracy makes rulers accountable to the ruled. The process through which it achieves this historically rare miracle is elections. These are imperfect instruments, since no perfect electoral system exists. Moreover, voters are, at best, rationally ignorant and, at worst, swayed by dangerous emotions. Nevertheless, even imperfect electoral systems may achieve something historically rare: a peaceful transfer of power, other than by inheritance. We have now seen that in Hungary, with the defeat of Viktor Orbán last April, in Serbia, with the defeat of Aleksandar Vučić in October, and most recently in the case of the US, with the defeat of the Republicans in the midterm congressional elections."}],[{"start":50.74,"text":"What is interesting about all three results is that they occurred despite varying attempts by incumbents to rig the electoral system and the media in their favour. If the people are sufficiently angry and the margin of victory for the political opposition big enough, even highly manipulative leaders can be swept aside. Needless to say, this does not always work. If the system is sufficiently rigged in favour of the tyrant in charge, elections can become meaningless in virtually all circumstances. Vladimir Putin’s Russia is a perfect example. But what we have learnt is that, short of this, the people’s votes still matter."}],[{"start":null,"text":"

Bar chart of Opinion poll of Ukrainian citizens — ‘In your opinion, when might the war end?’ (%) showing The majority of Ukrainians expect the war to last a long time
"}],[{"start":87.58,"text":"The difference between a full autocracy, in which only incapacity, an elite coup, or violence is likely to overthrow the ruler, and even an illiberal democracy turns out to matter enormously. This in turn changes the nature of the state itself. In an autocracy, sooner or later one will see the absolute corruption of absolute power — a corruption that is as much of knowledge as of motive. In a full autocracy, pleasing the tyrant comes to be the dominant motivation. This corrodes everything. It is why, in the long run, for all their faults, democratic societies are not just more enjoyable to inhabit but also far more efficient than any tyranny. Democracy guards against the follies of despots by making them accountable. This is, of course, why the latter rig elections."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
Bar chart of Opinion poll of Ukrainian citizens — ‘How much longer are you ready to endure the war?’ (%) showing The majority of Ukrainians are willing to fight on against Russia
"}],[{"start":134.76,"text":"If we look at the world of today, the place where the conflict between despotism and democracy is being waged most desperately is Ukraine. Russia’s tyrant, Putin, believes that Ukraine belongs to Russia because of its history. But the fact that a people and a territory were, in the past, part of an empire does not render the possession just. He also asserts that Ukraine is not a real country. Ukrainians have refuted that claim decisively since Russia’s invasion on February 24 2022. By fighting so effectively, they have proved that Ukraine is indeed a real country. Remember, too, that in Budapest in December 1994, Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal in return for security guarantees from the US, the UK, France, China and Russia. So, Putin is also repudiating his own country’s word."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":184.72,"text":"Furthermore, Ukrainians will continue to fight, because Russia threatens to dismember their country. As the strategic expert Lawrence Freedman argued in “Ukraine: With or Without Trump” on his Substack last month: “Trump continued to imply that the main obstacle [to a ceasefire] was Zelenskyy’s intransigence, as if he had a stake in a continuing war. All this was the opposite of the truth. Zelenskyy’s position on a ceasefire is far more aligned with Trump’s proposals than Putin’s.” Unfortunately, as recent events have shown, Donald Trump’s treachery matters. US resources remain essential for Ukraine, notably the provision of intelligence. Furthermore, Washington is also the principal interlocutor between Ukraine and Russia."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":228.3,"text":"Ukrainians continue to show determination. As Freedman notes, “the latest KIIS poll, published on 19 October, showed that around 64 per cent of respondents blamed Russia for stalling peace negotiations and rejected the idea that Ukraine’s government should be more willing to compromise. Around 62 per cent of Ukrainians are prepared to endure the war for as long as necessary. This includes the residents of Kyiv.” But they need much support. (See charts.)"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":253.68,"text":"So, what is to be done? Rachel Reeves, former British chancellor of the exchequer, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, former German minister for defence, Nathalie Loiseau, former French minister for Europe, and Chrystia Freeland, former Canadian deputy prime minister, have argued recently in The Times that “Ukraine faces a desperate winter as Russia pummels its almost defenceless people from the air. It also faces a €70bn financial hole next year. Without new funding, Kyiv’s capacity to sustain its defence will be gravely impaired. This will undermine Europe’s security because Ukraine is our first line of defence against Russian aggression.” The answer, they write, is “for the EU to take custody of the €210bn of sovereign Russian assets it immobilised in 2022 so it can use them to help Kyiv in its defence”. Moreover, these “assets are large enough to provide a funding bridge for Ukraine into 2029”."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":310,"text":"This is morally and practically a wise course. Might it still be possible to persuade Trump to give Ukraine the help the US alone can provide to enable this beleaguered country to escape the Carthaginian peace Putin seeks? Might the Democrats use some of their new leverage, especially over fiscal policy, to help ensure this outcome? I have no idea. But Europeans have to recognise what is at stake. To his credit, Friedrich Merz, Germany’s chancellor, has shown, in the EU budget debate, that he understands the need. The others have to follow him. Europe has to rise to this occasion or risk disintegration. If it fails, it might be picked to pieces by the world’s great powers. Europeans must act to save Ukraine from Putin’s tyranny, instead."}],[{"start":357.76,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1794409374_2081.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

黄仁勋会出售价值1350亿美元的股票吗?

英伟达联合创始人若试图减持股份,势必令投资者不安,但此举也面临法律和股价风险。

黄仁勋的伊卡洛斯时刻

AI亿万富翁是否飞得离太阳太近?

为什么择时交易是愚蠢之举(给自己的提醒)

近期股债价格剧烈波动,恰好提醒人们此时不宜采取行动。

贝森特指责卢特尼克领导的商务部未能将超速国际列入黑名单

美国财政部长的猛烈抨击可能加剧特朗普政府内部因英伟达丑闻引发的紧张关系。

AI智能体不应被迫冒充用户

从银行到在线平台的服务提供商都需要以公平条件提供标准化接入渠道。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×