登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
环保

Can China’s Demand Make Brazil Greener?

尼拉若、徐晋涛、刘金龙:若中国牛肉进口关税配额机制的设计旨在推动可持续发展与溯源管理,中国市场或将成为森林保护的强大力量。

For much of the past decade, the prevailing narrative surrounding Brazil’s trade relationship with China has centred on environmental risk. China’s vast demand for soyabeans and beef has frequently been portrayed as a principal driver of deforestation in the Amazon and the Cerrado, reinforcing a model of commodity expansion that threatens biodiversity and accelerates climate change. This concern is neither superficial nor unfounded. Yet it is incomplete. The deepening commercial ties between Brasília and Beijing have also contributed to meaningful environmental change within Brazil, particularly in the fields of renewable energy and livestock production. The central question now is whether these positive dynamics can be consolidated and extended so that trade becomes not merely compatible with environmental protection, but actively supportive of it.

The most visible and quantifiable environmental dividend of Brazil–China trade lies in the energy sector. Over the past 15 years, China’s large-scale industrial policy in photovoltaic manufacturing has driven a dramatic decline in the global cost of solar panels. This reduction in capital costs has transformed the economics of renewable energy deployment worldwide. Brazil, endowed with abundant solar irradiation but historically reliant on hydropower, has been a significant beneficiary. Solar power now accounts for more than 10 per cent of Brazil’s electricity generation, an extraordinary development for a country that only recently began investing seriously in distributed photovoltaic systems. When combined with hydropower, wind and bioenergy, renewable sources represent well over half of Brazil’s overall energy matrix and an even larger share of electricity generation.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

读者评论

用户名:
FT中文网欢迎读者发表评论,部分评论会被选进《读者有话说》栏目。我们保留编辑与出版的权利。
用户名
密码

美国打击伊朗花了多少钱?

据估算,自特朗普2月下旬下令美军发动打击以来的五周里,对伊行动的成本为223亿至310亿美元。

伊朗战争能扭转斯塔默的政治命运吗?

时任英国首相戈登•布朗对金融危机的应对让其政治生涯重焕生机,这或许能为陷入困境的现任英国首相提供范本。

乌克兰无人机削弱了俄罗斯因战争获得的石油暴利

俄罗斯受阻的能源出口使得本已因伊朗冲突而动荡的金融市场进一步承压。

FT社评:英国需要拿出一套国防投资方案

计划一再推迟,正引发合作伙伴担忧,并可能导致关键技术流失。

AI担忧与战争冲击交易活动,私募股权收购大幅下滑

截至3月的三个月内,私募股权集团达成的收购交易总额为1720亿美元,较前一季度下降36%。

摩根大通CEO警告私募信贷损失将超出预期

摩根大通掌门人杰米•戴蒙在年度致股东信中称,几乎各个领域的信贷标准都在小幅走弱。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×