The US Federal Reserve’s Trump problem - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
美国利率

The US Federal Reserve’s Trump problem

The president is undermining his own desire for lower interest rates
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.4,"text":"Last week was a particularly testing one for Jay Powell. Donald Trump resumed his criticism of the US Federal Reserve chair for not cutting interest rates faster by describing him as a “stupid person”. On Wednesday, US media reported that the president might nominate a new chair well before Powell’s term expires in May 2026. The White House later said no announcements were “imminent”, helping to quash a sell-off in the dollar. The rumours around his job rounded off a week that had started with other members of the Fed’s rate-setting committee pushing for cuts too."}],[{"start":46.449999999999996,"text":"If Trump wants rate cuts, his interventions and chaotic policy agenda are not helping his cause. For starters, should the president reveal his successor to Powell well before his term elapses, then it raises the worrying prospect of a “shadow Fed chair” who could signal a more dovish direction on rates from the sidelines. That would stoke confusion in markets, and distort the transmission of monetary policy. Right now it is also driving speculation of a loosening in the future policy stance. As recent market moves have shown, that weakens the dollar and boosts the case for higher rates at the margin."}],[{"start":88.47999999999999,"text":"Then there is the immediate uncertainty around the president’s tariff policies. At its meeting in mid-June, the Fed held rates at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent. But its policymakers were split on where they should go next. Recently two rate-setters — including Christopher Waller, a leading candidate to succeed Powell — said that the Fed ought to consider cuts as soon as next month. After all, there has been only a slight uptick in US inflation readings since the president’s April 2 tariff announcements. High rates are constraining growth. Credit card delinquencies are at their highest in over a decade and annual wage growth on job postings are at their joint lowest in four years."}],[{"start":137.45999999999998,"text":"But Powell’s caution is sensible. Data on Friday showed that in May annual growth in the core personal consumption expenditures index — the Fed’s preferred measure of inflation — rose to 2.7 per cent. Indeed, it is too early to judge the effects of tariffs on inflation. First, US businesses are still working through imported stockpiles. Price pressures from existing tariffs may not show up in the inflation numbers until the summer months. The Fed would then be in a better position to understand how higher duties are passing through supply chains."}],[{"start":176.29999999999998,"text":"Second, Trump’s full tariff package hasn’t even hit yet. It is unclear what duties will prevail beyond July 9, when the president’s deadline for trade partners to renegotiate his “liberation day” tariffs expires. When those levies take effect, they will push up prices further. The administration is also mulling additional sector-based tariffs. Other price pressures may build too. Global oil prices remain exposed to the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Trump’s tax-cutting “big beautiful bill” could add further price pressure."}],[{"start":213.57999999999998,"text":"If tariffs, the pass-through to consumers, and broader price shocks surprise to the upside then there is a risk of a sustained rise in inflation — not just a one-off jump in the price level. After all, Americans have experienced above-target price growth for over four years, and year-ahead inflation expectations remain elevated. But if the implementation of tariffs are delayed and uncertainty lingers, then demand may drop faster and thereby raise the case for cuts."}],[{"start":247.95999999999998,"text":"For now, keeping rates on hold feels like the safest option given all the uncertainty. But that means the risk of a policy mistake is high. If the central bank had more clarity on the extent and timing of tariffs — and the president’s broader agenda — it would be in a far better position to ascertain the risk of cutting rates sooner. The president will do well to realise that the dilemma the Fed faces is largely one of his own making."}],[{"start":285.62999999999994,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1751243496_6489.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Lex专栏:未进行对冲让嘉年华集团因小失大

与竞争对手相比,嘉年华集团因未及时锁定燃料敞口而付出代价。

美国各州围绕预测市场的一场豪赌

围绕监管权的争斗,可能重塑美国联邦体制的权力格局。

美国打击伊朗花了多少钱?

据估算,自特朗普2月下旬下令美军发动打击以来的五周里,对伊行动的成本为223亿至310亿美元。

伊朗战争能扭转斯塔默的政治命运吗?

时任英国首相戈登•布朗对金融危机的应对让其政治生涯重焕生机,这或许能为陷入困境的现任英国首相提供范本。

乌克兰无人机削弱了俄罗斯因战争获得的石油暴利

俄罗斯受阻的能源出口使得本已因伊朗冲突而动荡的金融市场进一步承压。

FT社评:英国需要拿出一套国防投资方案

计划一再推迟,正引发合作伙伴担忧,并可能导致关键技术流失。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×