US investors should beware of tariff complacency - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
社评

US investors should beware of tariff complacency

America’s bullish stock market is at odds with Trump’s policy agenda

After passing his tax-cutting “big, beautiful bill”, Donald Trump has been busy reviving his protectionist agenda. Last week the US president extended the 90-day pause on his “liberation day” import duties until August 1, and wrote punchy letters and social media posts to key trade partners, goading them to strike quick deals with his administration. He also proposed a 50 per cent levy on copper and a 200 per cent charge on pharmaceutical products. Wall Street, however, reacted nonchalantly. The S&P 500 continues to trade close to record highs, over 25 per cent above the lows it dipped to in the aftermath of Trump’s initial April 2 “reciprocal” tariff announcements.

With the president’s on-and-off levy declarations, it is indeed difficult to track where US tariff rates are, let alone predict where they will end up. That said, incorporating policy announcements through to July 13, the Yale Budget Lab estimates that the overall US average effective tariff rate could rise to its highest in over a century — and around eight times higher than where it was last year. At these levels, most economists would expect tariff-induced price rises eventually to sap profit margins and growth. If so, the US stock market has not received the message. Risk appetite remains high and valuations are rich.

There are two dominant explanations for the bullishness. First, investors have warmed to the idea that the president won’t actually follow through with his worst tariff threats — also known as the “Trump Always Chickens Out”, or “Taco”, trade. The president certainly has form in postponing or cancelling harmful economic policies. Second, the duties in place so far — including a 10 per cent universal tariff — have not yet had a significant impact on inflation or economic growth.

Both narratives are worryingly rose-tinted. It still requires a leap of faith to assume Trump will back away from implementing tariffs on August 1. Last week the president claimed that his import duties had been “very well received”, citing the stock market reaction.

America’s current economic performance is also a poor indicator of how it may fare in the coming months. Stockpiling has helped to restrain the pass-through of tariffs into consumer prices. Numerous companies have withdrawn earnings guidance amid the uncertainty too. Moreover, Trump’s full tariff package is yet to be enacted. The administration is mulling further sector-specific duties, which could pinch the US tech industry, the driving force behind America’s stock market strength. For these reasons, second-quarter company results over the coming weeks ought to be parsed carefully.

Broader policy risks have also grown. Last week, the White House accused the Federal Reserve chair, Jay Powell, of “grossly” mismanaging a refurbishment of the central bank’s headquarters. That opened a new front in the administration’s destabilising attacks on the central bank’s independence. Trump’s deficit-raising budget bill is adding to concerns over the sustainability of America’s public finances. The economy is losing momentum too: the jobs market is cooling and consumer spending has weakened.

Corporate America has shown its resilience by confounding the gloomiest forecasts so far, and Trump might once again chicken out. But the heightened uncertainty alone is enough reason for investors to exercise caution. A correction from current heights would be painful: stock markets are heavily concentrated and the share of household assets held in equities is also near a historic high. Right now, US stocks appear priced for the most optimistic of outcomes. With a capricious leader in the White House, that looks more like blind faith than rational thinking.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×