Ukraine talks expose Trump’s dreadful attention to detail - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
战争

Ukraine talks expose Trump’s dreadful attention to detail

Zelenskyy and allies contain White House’s tilt towards Moscow for now
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

Many in Europe feared Trump would railroad Zelenskyy into a bad deal or punish him for rejecting one
"}],[{"start":9.04,"text":"In their meetings at the White House on Monday, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European allies averted another diplomatic disaster after the fiasco of Donald Trump’s summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week. In Anchorage, the US president rolled over and aligned himself with Russia’s stance on ending the war. Many in Europe feared Trump would railroad Zelenskyy into a bad deal or punish him for rejecting one. Some skilfully co-ordinated messaging and plenty of flattery by the European side helped to avoid what would have been a terrible outcome for Ukraine, European security and the survival of the west."}],[{"start":54.62,"text":"Confident, overly so, in his ability to bring Putin to a peace deal, Trump said he would arrange a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents. It is unclear when it will take place or even whether the Kremlin will agree. In Trump’s peacemaking show, optics matter more than substance. The vague prospect of another meeting is enough to keep it moving forward."}],[{"start":85,"text":"European leaders are pleased that Trump gave them a more sympathetic hearing than they were braced for, but they did not fully wind back the clock to before Alaska. Trump has sided with Moscow over the need for a comprehensive settlement rather than a ceasefire and has dropped any hint of sanctions."}],[{"start":108.85,"text":"He did say on Monday it was up to Ukraine to discuss issues about land. But he seems to think that Ukraine could end the war “immediately” if it gave up the rest of Donetsk and Luhansk, which would be politically and militarily suicidal for Zelenskyy."}],[{"start":128.68,"text":"The most promising development was Trump’s support for some kind of US contribution to security guarantees for Ukraine after previously skating over the issue. By all accounts, this was the main topic of Monday’s proceedings. The president gave the Europeans an opening."}],[{"start":152.06,"text":"However, there is confusion about what Trump has in mind. He said the US would be “involved” with “co-ordination” of European efforts and air support. He also talked about providing “Article 5-like” protection, a reference to Nato’s mutual defence clause. Steve Witkoff, his credulous envoy, even claimed Russia could accept such a guarantee, another supposed “concession” from Moscow."}],[{"start":179.44,"text":"But Nato’s Article 5 is imprecise, obliging each member only to “take such action as it deems necessary” to come to an ally’s aid. Nato’s strength lies in its centralised military command, defence plans and force commitments. Moscow might well agree to a version of Article 5. During talks with Ukraine in 2022, it was open to one, but with Russia taking part — and yielding a veto. Such an arrangement would be a sham guarantee."}],[{"start":215.23,"text":"The Ukrainians rightly demand robust and meaningful commitments from allies to come to its aid. In the absence of Nato membership, it would be better for the US to provide intelligence, reconnaissance and air support for a European mission. But that would require a willingness by all to fight back if attacked by Russia."}],[{"start":237.56,"text":"Senior officials on both sides of the Atlantic are beginning more detailed work on what guarantees might mean. Better late than never. Trump has a propensity to ignore the difficult details of any negotiation. He flip flops and then lands on the broad contours of a deal, with little regard to what it means in practice. It is bad enough in trade relations but worse in matters of war and peace."}],[{"start":268.7,"text":"To stand any chance of bringing peace to Ukraine, Trump has to grapple with the core contradiction: Ukraine will not agree to give up land under its control; Russia will reject any security guarantee that looks credible. It may be possible to chart a way through, but not without the US paying more attention to detail and applying more pressure on Moscow."}],[{"start":303.78000000000003,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1755661898_2320.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×