AI poses a new antitrust problem - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
人工智能

AI poses a new antitrust problem

Washington cheered on the consolidation of the social web in the 2010s — it must not make the same mistake today
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

By taking controlling stakes in AI companies, hyperscalers are ensuring that the industry evolves in a way that serves their infrastructure
"}],[{"start":6.69,"text":"The writer is former associate director for litigation in the FTC’s Bureau of Competition and co-founder of Simonsen Sussman"}],[{"start":15.830000000000002,"text":"I joined the Federal Trade Commission in the summer of 2021, just weeks after a federal judge dismissed the agency’s antitrust complaint against Facebook. It was a frantic, all-hands-on-deck moment. I was thrown into a room with lawyers and economists and tasked with keeping the case alive."}],[{"start":36.91,"text":"We rewrote the complaint, which challenged Facebook’s acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp in 2012 and 2014 respectively. Even then we were well aware of how late it was. If the FTC eventually won at trial (which, spoiler, it did not), the appeals process and complexity of unwinding these companies meant that a remedy might not arrive until 2029 — 17 years after the first acquisition."}],[{"start":67.21,"text":"Last month, Judge James Boasberg ruled that Meta was not a monopoly. The decision highlighted the difficulty that regulators around the world have in challenging acquisitions long after their completion."}],[{"start":81.6,"text":"Yet when Facebook made these purchases, regulators offered little pushback. This reflected a broader pathology at the time. In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the American economy seemed precarious. Against that backdrop, Silicon Valley offered a glimmer of hope. Companies like Facebook and Google were viewed as national champions. CEOs were paraded through the White House, treated as dignitaries of a new economic order."}],[{"start":113,"text":"We are now watching history repeat itself. Just as the government cheered on the consolidation of the social web in the 2010s, Washington is offering similar support today for the “hyperscalers” — Microsoft, Amazon and Google — to position themselves as guardians of artificial intelligence. Despite tough rhetoric, the administration is not pushing back on AI deals. We saw this recently when the Department of Justice cleared Google’s acquisition of cloud security company Wiz, waving through further consolidation in the cloud security market. Similarly, the regulatory response to the $38bn cloud deal between Amazon and OpenAI — an arrangement that binds the most prominent AI start-up to a dominant cloud incumbent — has been muted."}],[{"start":166.03,"text":"Such deals are fraught with conflict of interest. By taking controlling stakes in AI companies, hyperscalers are ensuring that the industry evolves in a way that serves their infrastructure and increases the moats around their lines of business. They have every incentive to direct innovation towards massive, data-hungry, compute-inefficient models rather than efficient, decentralised systems."}],[{"start":192.73,"text":"Yet instead of scrutiny, we are seeing a pilgrimage of AI CEOs to the White House. Proposals for a moratorium on state AI laws have been made. This is the language of antitrust amnesty. It suggests that, once again, economic uncertainty is leading Washington to trade competition for the pursuit of international corporate leadership."}],[{"start":216.26999999999998,"text":"The contrast between the current administration and the previous one is stark. When Nvidia attempted to acquire Arm in 2020 — a deal that would have locked down the fundamental architecture of chips used for AI — the FTC sued to block it and the deal was abandoned. Because Arm remained independent, Google is now able to compete with Nvidia in the production of AI chips, using Arm’s technology to build its own processors.  "}],[{"start":247.74999999999997,"text":"Regulators waited too long to address the danger that Facebook’s acquisitions posed to competition. This should be a wake-up call for the AI era. If we allow hyperscalers to devour the AI ecosystem under the guise of national competition, we will be left with a tech sector that is more centralised and more extractive than the one we have today. By the time it is a problem, it may once again be too late to change."}],[{"start":283.82,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1765248116_1543.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国需要新经济议程

哈伯德:单靠促进增长的政策,无法解决那些担心生活成本的选民的忧虑。

美国通胀数据能否缓解生活成本焦虑?

《市场前瞻》是英国《金融时报》对未来一周的指引。
2小时前

美国渴望重归社区生活

中期选举只是最新的希望迹象。

波兰克拉科夫枪击事件致6人死亡

波兰总理唐纳德•图斯克呼吁政界人士不要利用这一事件。

欧洲是否开始认真摆脱对科技的依赖?

布鲁塞尔虽方向正确,仍可更有力地推动各国政府行动。

AI将削减管理人员编制

接下来可能连他们的薪级也要重估。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×