America needs a real Congress - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
美国政治

America needs a real Congress

Trump has faced little scrutiny. The midterm elections could change that
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.6,"text":"The most illuminating moment in what is widely seen as the worst US Congress in memory was when King Charles III addressed the body in April. The British monarch’s speech, which praised America’s separation of powers and historic checks on misuse of executive power, was interrupted by repeated ovations. That the King’s words seemed chiefly aimed at his host, Donald Trump, did not stop Republicans from leaping to their feet. The irony is that Congress had abdicated its most basic duty 15 months before it heard from the King. It has not even made a show of holding the Trump administration to account."}],[{"start":43.642,"text":"The US electorate will on Tuesday vote in midterm elections on the new Congress to replace America’s 119th. It cannot come a moment too soon. Congress’s absence has been literal as well as constitutional. The House of Representatives spent 383 hours in session from January to August, by far the lowest in a midterm year since at least 1990."}],[{"start":67,"text":"Other than Trump’s “big, beautiful bill”, which delivered tax cuts only partially funded by cuts in healthcare spending, few reforms were passed. The only two notable bipartisan bills have largely been ignored by Trump. The first was a law mandating release of all of the Epstein files; roughly half have not been made public. The second was a bill passed after Republican senator Lindsey Graham died, giving Trump authority to impose tougher sanctions on Russia. The president responded by relaxing sanctions. Ignoring Congress has been his leitmotif."}],[{"start":100.36,"text":"His life under divided government could look very different. Polls suggest Democrats will regain the House of Representatives and have a good shot at retaking the Senate. The larger their margin of victory, the harder it will be for Trump to contest the outcome. Having been blocked by courts from taking control of the mail-in ballots and denied possession of state voter rolls, Trump has hinted at more direct intervention."}],[{"start":124.36,"text":"Though armed federal agents are barred from polling stations, disinformation about non-citizen voters triggering raids by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency cannot be ruled out. It would be ominous for US democracy were Trump to send masked gunmen to voting places. It would still be hard for him to overturn a clear result."}],[{"start":144.28,"text":"A Democratic Party takeover of Capitol Hill would trigger high expectations. Yet their power would be limited. Trump would be almost certain to veto their priorities, such as reversing healthcare cuts and abolishing ICE. He is also unlikely to comply with House or Senate investigations into his own and his administration’s alleged corruption."}],[{"start":165.4,"text":"Congress can issue subpoenas for personnel to testify and demand files be handed over. But its enforcement powers are limited in practice. Moreover, the body can only refer prosecutions to the US Department of Justice, which is run by Todd Blanche, a Trump loyalist. The Democrats’ best hope is thus to chronicle Trump’s profit-making and his own and his family’s gaping conflicts of interest. They should also probe the damage wrought by Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency that shuttered parts of the US government without authorisation."}],[{"start":198.26,"text":"Any move to impeach Trump, however, would be rash. A third attempt would have no better chance than the first two of securing the two-thirds Senate majority needed to convict him. Such “lawfare” could also restore the president’s badly tarnished standing with parts of Maga. No matter how angrily Trump reacts to the investigations, Democrats have the means to shine a light on his exorbitant abuse of power. That means educating the US public. Their hopes for the 2028 presidential election could hinge on how well or badly they do that."}],[{"start":231.46,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1793578380_3379.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×