How the Trump era crashed - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 选举

How the Trump era crashed

The US president forgot the economic bit of populism
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.56,"text":"In April, the Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán lost power at last. His Italian counterpart and “Christian sister” Giorgia Meloni had misjudged a major referendum just before. Last month, two rightwingers flunked presidential elections: Flávio Bolsonaro in Brazil, Aleksandar Vučić in Serbia. Nigel Farage’s Reform UK, which polled 31 per cent in 2025, some feat in a fragmented electorate, has since bled 10 percentage points."}],[{"start":35.12,"text":"Whatever the Latin is for “fairly bad year” — annus horribilis is too strong — populism is living through one. The defeat of US Republicans on Tuesday is its culmination. Not one house of Congress, but both, fell to the Democrats in midterm elections."}],[{"start":51.96,"text":"How did it come to this? In the end, Donald Trump, like lots of populists, forgot the economic bit of populism. Besides a liking for tariffs and a ceasefire in the war against Obamacare, it is hard to distinguish him from a laissez-faire Republican of yesteryear. When consumers were broadly content, this was a minor point. When inflation rose, it became an electoral liability."}],[{"start":75.48,"text":"Inflation is said to be fatal for incumbents. But Lula survived in Brazil. The UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham has gained in the polls. In 2026, the politicians that inflation really punishes are those who seem callous. Over the past year, as consumers wailed, Trump and his kin made over $1bn in pre-tax profits, in part from the digital currencies sector. Almost half of 2024 Republican voters, never mind independents, went into the midterms citing White House “corruption, self-dealing and conflicts of interest” as a concern. Things that voters didn’t mind when inflation was low — that were laughed off as part of Maga’s raffish charm — now unhinge them."}],[{"start":116.36,"text":"Trump’s foreign friends run into the same problem. Farage is under investigation over an undeclared gift of £5mn, which is a living wage even in London. Flávio? A money laundering probe. Orbán? Allegations of crony capitalism. The left isn’t innocent but politicians of the right have such a blind spot for this stuff, for the resentment it causes in hard times, that terming them “populist” seems excessive flattery."}],[{"start":145.08,"text":"Even aside from the self-dealing, or suspicions thereof, there is the matter of economic policy. Maga faces two ways on this. It is a movement of “real people” but also bitcoin spivs, of paternalist government but also tech libertarianism, of the deindustrialised Midwest but also the low-tax Sunbelt. Something, at some point, was going to make the internal contradictions untenable. Consumer inflation was it. That some of the price surge stems from Trump’s own war in Iran just adds to the poetry of the historical moment."}],[{"start":178.48,"text":"It doesn’t help that populists so often choose silver-spoon leaders. Trump, like Flávio, is a fortunate son. Farage, like Boris Johnson, went to private school in a country where only about 6 per cent of people do that. If these men were economic leftists — “traitors to our class”, in Zhou Enlai’s supposed words — their privilege would be no issue. In fact, if inflation were 1.8 per cent, it would be no issue. But the privilege and the deregulating instincts and the rising consumer prices and the alleged self-enrichment? It makes them almost too easy to frame as out-of-touch. Notice that two of the most successful populists, Meloni and India’s Narendra Modi, really came from the masses they romanticise."}],[{"start":222.76,"text":"American populism can survive the midterms but in different form: less decadent and libertarian, less billionaire-smitten. Under whose leadership, though? Steve Bannon is an economic populist — an AI sceptic — but almost a decade has passed since he was a White House insider. JD Vance seems to understand that Republicans must recover the working-class spirit of 2016. The question is whether that most online of conservatives will ever master interaction with three-dimensional mammals. Trump’s genius is to do and say extreme things without weirding people out. When his subordinates attempt it, you fear for the future of the movement."}],[{"start":264.1,"text":"Perhaps time would have ground Trump down, regardless of his policies. The populists who are polling best, such as the French and German ones, are those who have never governed. The rest have what a British cop might call “previous”. Flávio is tied to his old man’s regime. Farage, though he has never held ministerial office, co-authored Brexit, the UK’s governing meta-idea since 2016. Trump is on his second term, and ninth decade. A president’s last midterms aren’t meant to go well. It is just that, with more economic intervention, or just less feathering of the Trump nest, the result might have been mere defeat rather than total humiliation. He started a class war against elites a decade ago and never lived up to it."}],[{"start":307.68,"text":"The midterm results should not cheer liberals too much, and not just because Trump will command the world’s mightiest armed forces for another 26 months. If it is true that economic grievances are what defeated him, then lots of other important issues didn’t. The swing voters’ reaction to him seems to go as follows. Attempted election subversion? Bad. Kremlin-abetting? Not OK. Higher prices at the gas pump? Now that is where we draw the line."}],[{"start":333.36,"text":"If people prioritise their household finances, that is right and natural. At some point, though, for constitutional democracy to survive, voters have to care about the rules of the game too. That it was economics rather than ethics that brought low this most transactional of men is fitting, and perhaps, in a sense, his last win."}],[{"start":353.72,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1793863339_6854.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×