Norway’s $2.3tn oil fund urged to relax nuclear weapons ban - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
商业快报

Norway’s $2.3tn oil fund urged to relax nuclear weapons ban

World’s largest sovereign wealth fund could invest in major defence groups under proposals
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":8.04,"text":"Norway’s $2.3tn oil fund should be able to invest in major defence groups currently barred for their role in nuclear weapons production, according to a government-appointed committee, in a move that could lead to it taking stakes in companies such as Boeing and BAE Systems."}],[{"start":23.58,"text":"The world’s largest sovereign wealth fund’s ethical investing rules currently prevent it from taking stakes in companies such as Lockheed Martin and Airbus because they make parts for nuclear weapons."}],[{"start":34,"text":"But an expert group commissioned by the government to review the guidelines on Thursday recommended lifting the embargo for companies based in a nuclear state allied to Norway, potentially paving the way for 13 of the 14 excluded businesses to become part of the fund’s holdings."}],[{"start":49.16,"text":"These would include General Dynamics, Honeywell, and Northrop Grumman but India’s Larsen & Toubro would remain banned."}],[{"start":56.2,"text":"Norway’s finance minister — and former Nato secretary-general — Jens Stoltenberg told the FT last year that it was a “paradox” that the rich Scandinavian country was a member of Nato and enjoyed the benefits of its nuclear umbrella, but was unable to invest in some of the largest US, UK and French defence groups."}],[{"start":74.54,"text":"The proposal is likely to be controversial in Norway, where Stoltenberg’s government is dependent on leftwing parties in parliament to pass its budgets. At least three of those parties expressed displeasure at the move on nuclear weapons as well as other measures that they argued would weaken the oil fund’s ethical standards."}],[{"start":91.24,"text":"Stoltenberg ordered the review last year after the independent council on the study of ethics indicated it was about to look at barring companies such as Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet because of their work for the Israeli government."}],[{"start":null,"text":"

Jens Stoltenberg sits at a table in a dimly lit room, resting his chin on his hand and looking at the camera.
"}],[{"start":103.48,"text":"Oda Indgaard, a Green party MP, said on Thursday: “This is absolutely insane . . . If these proposals are adopted by parliament, it would represent a major ethical collapse and a giant step backwards in the management of the oil fund.”"}],[{"start":116.92,"text":"Kirsti Bergstø, leader of the Socialist Left party, added that lifting the ban on nuclear weapons would be “completely the wrong direction in turbulent times, when the world needs more disarmament”."}],[{"start":127.32,"text":"The government will publish its response to the expert review in April, and its proposal will be debated and adopted by parliament next year."}],[{"start":135.94,"text":"The review, led by former central bank governor Svein Gjedrem, recommended that the council of ethics should no longer be able to recommend excluding a company from the oil fund, and should instead evaluate the risk of an ethical breach on a case-by-case basis."}],[{"start":151.28,"text":"The review said the fund had become so large, and so crucial to the country’s welfare state, that it was important to protect its ability to generate long-term returns. A quarter of Norway’s national budget comes from annual withdrawals from the fund."}],[{"start":166.48,"text":"Norway’s central bank — which is home to the manager of the oil fund — should take the decision whether to exclude a company or use other tools to deal with the problem, the committee said."}],[{"start":176.92,"text":"Gjedrem warned the government and fund that exclusions should be directed against companies, not states. The oil fund became mired in controversy last year when it was forced to sell half of its holdings in Israel and divest from US manufacturing group Caterpillar because of the war in Gaza."}],[{"start":193.92,"text":"Caterpillar’s exclusion led to strong criticism of the fund from US politicians close to President Donald Trump."}],[{"start":206.12,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1792069914_4547.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×