Healey criticised after raiding contingency funds for defence - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
商业快报

Healey criticised after raiding contingency funds for defence

Chancellor accused of kicking security ‘into the long grass’ by Labour chair of defence committee
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":8.6,"text":"Chancellor John Healey is using government reserves and betting on public-private partnerships as he seeks to increase defence spending towards the goal of 3 per cent of GDP by 2030."}],[{"start":19.6,"text":"Healey’s Budget was heavily criticised by Tan Dhesi, a senior Labour MP and chair of the Commons Defence Select Committee, who accused the chancellor of kicking security “into the long grass”."}],[{"start":30.64,"text":"“We risk leaving ourselves seriously vulnerable in the event of a major conflict,” Dhesi warned."}],[{"start":36.36,"text":"His intervention provoked a strong rebuttal from Wes Streeting, the defence secretary, who said it was “completely unfounded” and added: “I don’t care if he’s the chair of the Defence Select Committee.”"}],[{"start":47.6,"text":"Meeting the 3 per cent target will require an extra £11bn in spending a year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies think-tank said on Thursday. The government is not expected to set out full details until next year’s spending review."}],[{"start":61.04,"text":"Wednesday’s Budget did reveal that Healey will partially fund the extra £4.7bn required by the Defence Investment Plan (DIP) by using departmental reserves, which are intended for unforeseen contingencies."}],[{"start":73.56,"text":"Former chancellor Rachel Reeves was critical of the last Conservative government for using such emergency buffers for asylum costs within the Home Office."}],[{"start":82.2,"text":"“It would be a shame if we returned to these sorts of spending management practices,” said Bee Boileau, an economist at the IFS. “That is really not what the reserve is for.”"}],[{"start":92.28,"text":"The Treasury called the move “fair and balanced” in its Budget document. It also found money for the DIP by “reprioritisation” of department budgets to free up £3bn."}],[{"start":102.6,"text":"Healey also suggested that the government wanted to use more “innovative financing” to boost defence commitments as well as new PPPs."}],[{"start":110.4,"text":"Officials said more details would be provided in a defence finance and investment strategy this autumn."}],[{"start":115.9,"text":"UK defence figures expressed scepticism about new PPPs. One person warned that the plan could resemble “PFI Mark II — and become an absolute shambles”, a reference to the controversial public finance initiative model used by Sir Tony Blair’s Labour government to build infrastructure such as hospitals and schools."}],[{"start":134.92,"text":"The chancellor also gave notice at the Budget that he would press ahead with treaty negotiations to establish the Multilateral Defence Mechanism — a venture with the Netherlands, Poland and Finland, aimed at boosting investment and improving joint procurement — to help Britain reach the 3 per cent spending target."}],[{"start":152.28,"text":"The plan sketched out this year is for the MDM to operate like an international financing institution, with a mix of guarantees and paid-in capital from participating countries."}],[{"start":162.2,"text":"Offering a personal anecdote to stress his commitment to funding the military, Healey recalled how his son, a British Army reservist, “came back four years ago from early training to say they had no kit and they had no bullets to fire”. He accused the Conservatives of having “hollowed out” the armed forces."}],[{"start":179.04,"text":"But while his promise to increase defence spending was viewed as a step forward, it remained “aspirational until it’s fully funded”, said Ed Arnold, senior associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute think-tank."}],[{"start":191.52,"text":"He warned: “The government thinks it has set out that path [to 3 per cent military expenditure], but only on a graph. That doesn’t do much in terms of their credibility.”"}],[{"start":204.68,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1793346418_6085.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×